Page 1 of 1

xmlrpc Problem with scribefire an other editors

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:25 pm
by saaryoda
Hi all,
i use the newest(nightly) S9y and the xmlrpc plugin.
I found in the Internet that i can use the html comment "<!--more-->" in scribefire to tell s9y that the following text ist the advanced entry.
I tried WLW and QUmana aswell. But anyone of them wont work with s9y advanced entry.
Other functions in scribefire work perfect.

Is this a bug in the xmlrpc plugin or between my ears..


Greetz

Re: xmlrpc Problem with scribefire an other editors

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:20 am
by garvinhicking
Hi!

Where did you read this about <!--more-->? s9y does not support this to my belief.

The XML-RPC API uses a "mt_text_more" XMLRPC flag that must be used for advanced entries. It is a seperate field like the body, date, title etc. Your XMLRPC client must support this field...

Or of course support for <!--more--> can be added to the plugin if someone codes it ;)

Regards,
Garvin

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:00 am
by saaryoda
Hi Garvin,
i read this under http://blog.brockha.us/index.php?/archi ... eiben.html

and

http://blog.softcat.org/index.php?/arch ... ipity.html

Section "erweiterter Artikel"

I'm wrong?

Greetz

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:33 am
by garvinhicking
Hi!

If this works, it must be a WLW feature. S9y does not do this, so it seems the client itself uses this for a sepeartion to use the mt_text_more field.

Regards,
Garvin